UK trying to frustrate the International Court of Justice in the Israel/Palestine conflict
August 2023
The UK, in common with some other western countries such as Germany and the US, is trying to block the ICJ from considering international humanitarian law matters in relation to the Israeli government’s treatment of the Palestinians. A legal opinion has been leaked enabling us to see the reasoning behind the government’s position. The opinion, if genuine, claims it is ‘inappropriate for [the UK] to insert itself into a bilateral dispute without Israel’s consent’. The most obvious thing to say is that such consent is unlikely ever to be given.
Another argument in the opinion is that it will hamper prospects for relaunching Israel/Palestine negotiations, prospects for which are vanishingly small. The two state solution collapsed in 2014, nearly a decade ago. The opinion does not seem to take into account recent developments in Israel and the statements by Itamar ben Gvir, leader of the ‘Jewish Power’ party and currently the National Security Minister, who said ‘his rights in the occupied West Bank are more important than those of Palestinians’. This and similar remarks in interviews have led to condemnation by the US government. Gvir has also fallen out with Bella Hadid, the super model who repeated his remarks in a blog.
Violence has increased in Israel and the process of seizing land and destroying Palestinian/Arab communities and land continues at a fast and increasing pace.
The opinion also claims that this is a ‘bi-lateral dispute’ which may be true but it has not hindered the UK government and other members of NATO, from interfering in a ‘bilateral dispute’ which happens to be called Ukraine.
The ICJ is the main UN judicial organisation and it played a key role in ending the apartheid system being run by the South African government in Namibia. It also forced an unwilling UK government to open talks with Mauritius concerning the Chagos Islands and the forced removal of its people.
Whether the ICJ will follow through on this and endorse the reports by a range of human rights organisations alleging Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians amounts to apartheid remains to be seen. Both the government and the Labour party seem blind to the actions of the Israeli government in the occupied territories. Both steadfastly refuse the accept the considerable evidence of apartheid in the country. No reasons have been provided. For Labour, it is possibly a legacy of the bruising anti-semitism allegations the party received under the previous leader of the party.
Sources: BBC; Guardian; 972 Magazine
