Text of letter sent to Salisbury Journal
The following letter was sent to the Journal in Salisbury but regrettably for space or other reasons it was not published (14th April). We do not know at present what the current situation is with the promised bill to abolish the Human rights Act and replace it with a British Bill of Rights (or whatever it is to be called). It is a manifesto promise and a draft was to be published in the Autumn but has not yet appeared. It is possible that the arrival of Michael Gove into the Justice Dept. had something to do with it.
Now that we are in full swing with the debate about leaving the European Union, it is possible that this has been shelved for the moment. Mr Gove is a leading proponent for the Brexit camp who – if current polls are to be believed – are doing well at the moment. The calculation may therefore be that if they win then the scene is set to dump the HRA as well.
On the other hand, there will be a heavy workload in managing our exit and carrying out the negotiations to secure access to the European market once we leave, so there will be limited civil service and parliamentary time to spend on a new Bill of Rights.
But back to the letter and our local MP John Glen is keen to abolish the HRA and it would be a pity if he is given space in the Journal again to put forward his views and the opportunity is not given to those who disagree with him. The unpublished letter:
Britain has had a proud history of leading the charge on human rights progress from the aftermath of the Second World War when we were key drafters of the European Convention of Human Rights, to the suffragette movement, to gay rights and other equality legislation. We have often been champions of progress.What a shame, then, that this year the UK was singled out for criticism in Amnesty International’s annual report on the state of the world’s human rights. Amnesty is warning that the government’s plan to tear up the Human Rights Act is a gift to dictators all over the world. Russia recently drafted legislation which allows it to ignore human rights rulings it doesn’t agree with. Far from being able to condemn that action and call on Putin to uphold basic human rights, the UK is actually talking about following suit. Music to the Kremlin’s ears, no doubt.Here in Salisbury, the local Amnesty group is campaigning to save the Human Rights Act. Britain should be a world leader on human rights. The Human Rights Act protects ordinary people – from the elderly to hospital patients, to domestic violence victims – and we want to see those protections spoken about with pride by our politicians. We should be redoubling our commitment to enduring human rights principles in these troubling times, not undermining them.Let’s hope next year’s annual report on the UK reads: “much improved”.